You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘newspaper’ tag.

大家終於清楚知道:禮義廉是民建聯的註冊商標一部份,大家絕不能模仿!

在此一讚民建聯:你好誠實啊!

明報即時新聞:社民連在維園年宵攤位售賣T恤被指侵犯民建聯註冊商標,海關下午派人扣查。

海關表示,幾日前接到民建聯投訴,尋求律政司意見後採取行動,今次行動與一般打擊冒牌貨行動無分別。海關在行動中,檢走約110件T恤,暫時無人被捕。

社民連秘書長季詩傑說,事件是針對性檢控,已聯絡律師。他指出,T恤是網民設計,放在社民連的攤位售賣,所得款項供五區辭職的活動之用。


廣告

“周啟邦的獨子周國豐在醫院召開記者會…表示,父親彌留時,母親、他和太太陪伴在側。父親最大的遺願是能夠見到男孫一面,他的太太預產期本來是年初四,但在催生下已在5日出世,父親能夠如願以償,可以抱孫。"(明報即時新聞)

遺願…是遺留下來的願望,是人死了還沒有達成的吧?都已經達成了的,還遺什麼願呢?

“父親生前最大的心願是能夠見到男孫一面…已經如願以償",這不就簡單直接了嗎?

Was reading Mingpao today and read this article:

出土石刻或證基督信仰源自猶太教

 【明報專訊】一塊自死海出土的石塊刻文,可能令世人不得不重新評估基督信仰的起源和發展。經鑑證,有關的石塊刻文早在耶穌出生前數十年已出現,但內容似乎已提到彌賽亞死後3天復活,引起宗教界及考古學界爭議。有論者質疑,有關刻文似乎正引證,「死後3天復活」早在耶穌出生前,已成為猶太人的傳統故事內容。

 死海出土 耶穌出生前文物

 該石塊高3呎,上有87行希伯來文,罕有用墨書寫。石塊已破裂,部分字不可辨,預料將引起學者不同詮釋。特拉維夫大學考古學教授戈倫(Yuval Goren)已對該石塊作化學檢驗,他表示並無理由懷疑該石塊的真偽。該石塊早於十年前出土,由一名瑞士猶太人購買收藏,但該收藏家並不知道該石塊的意義,直至數年前一名以色列學者仔細研究該石塊後,才知意義不同凡響。

 加州大學柏克萊分校猶太教法典教授博亞林(Daniel Boyarin)表示,該石塊進一步說明,只有通過仔細研究耶穌所屬年代的猶太歷史,才能更全面了解耶穌這人物。他說﹕「基督徒或會覺得這是令人震驚的,因為這對基督教神學的獨一無二性構成挑戰。」新約《聖經》有關彌賽亞的描述,跟猶太教最大分別,便是彌賽亞的形象是受苦的,且死後3天復活。但若有關說法早在耶穌出生前便流傳,那麼這便顯示基督教的教義源於猶太教,對耶穌的傳統認識更可能要重新評估。

 提及天使命令3天後復活

 石塊上的文字內容,是關於「加伯利大天使」的啟示,當中引述舊約聖經中的先知預言。石塊部分文字已脫落,經研究後,希伯萊大學聖經研究教授諾爾(Israel Knohl) 認為,該石塊第80行寫的是﹕「我,加伯利,命令你3天後生存。」他命令的是「王子中的王子」,希伯來聖經《但以理書》曾提及加伯利及「王子中的王子」,諾爾認為石塊所寫的,是關於一名猶太人領袖死後3天復活。他表示該名領袖有可能是被希律王殺死的歷史人物西蒙,石塊可能是出自西蒙追隨者之手。他說﹕「這會動搖我們對基督教的基本看法。死後3天復活是耶穌出生前已出現的主題,這跟一直以來的說法大相逕庭。新約《聖經》中耶穌及其門徒的說法,都是以早期的彌賽亞故事為根據。」

 過往耶穌時代文獻出土總掀起大爭議,以60年前出土的死海古卷為例,學者目前仍為古卷作者及意義爭論不休。

 紐約時報

The original text from New York Times is here.

So what if this tablet shows that Christianity is originated from Judaism? Didn’t everybody know that Christianity IS originated from Judaism? 

So what if Jesus’ teaching is based on Old Testament? Didn’t everyone who has read the Bible know that,  too?

And how about the prediction of death and resurrection of Messiah? OF COURSE there were such predictions. Many scriptures from the Old Testament are related to that!

“it suggests that the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognized Jewish tradition at the time…Resurrection after three days becomes a motif developed before Jesus, which runs contrary to nearly all scholarship. What happens in the New Testament was adopted by Jesus and his followers based on an earlier messiah story…He notes that in the Gospels, Jesus makes numerous predictions of his suffering and New Testament scholars say such predictions must have been written in by later followers because there was no such idea present in his day. But there was, he said, and “Gabriel’s Revelation” shows it."

So, one single tablet can prove that it’s a motif developed before Jesus, a recognized Jewish tradition? Now I understand why some believe that no one died in June-4 Incident as there’re more than one who have said so. 

I really don’t see how this may ignite debate over Messiah and resurrection. The tablet is, of course, worthy of study. It shows something from the past. It may fill some gaps… or it may create more gaps. Either way, it is good for understanding history. But to have the core of Christianity shaken by this finding… It’s unlikely to happen.

十二月 2017
« 十一月    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

分類